Category: Linda Ayres vs StateFarm et al

Categories
#GoshDarnMeanieHeads #GotContractorComplaints #VirtualCombatSkills Court of Public Opinion Linda Ayres vs StateFarm et al LITTLE HOUSE ON THE MESA MoldCongress.com State Farm

THEY ASK — WHERE’S THE TIMELINE??? MOLD CAN START UP WITHIN 24 HOURS – SO THE EXPERTS SAY- CLEAN UP AND DRY OUT FAST! REMEDIATE!

#VirtualCombatSkills

You’ll find the most threads on LinkedIn, Twitter and some on Facebook and Google.  If you live in a home, you might be fascinated by how some companies can destroy your home and health, and seem to get away with it. 

BE YOUR OWN HERO!  BE A SMART HOMEOWNER!  Insurance Fraud is NOT A VICTIMLESS CRIME

Enhance your #VirtualCombatSkills as necessary BECAUSE #WeAreTheMediaNow

Google It!! #Boom #Boom #Boom  https://tinyurl.com/GotContractorComplaints-Google

LinkedIn #Boom! https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/gotcontractorcomplaints/

Twitter #Boom #Boom https://twitter.com/search?q=%23GotContractorComplaints&src=typed_query

Facebook! #Boom #Boom #Boom https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=%23GotContractorComplaints

THEY ASK…. WHERE’S THE TIMELINE?

ROOF BLEW OFF HOME FEBRUARY 2, 2019 – AND HOME WAS SYSTEMATICALLY DESTROYED BY STATE FARM PREFERRED VENDORS, WITHOUT REMEDIATION. March 8, 2019 – Policy Holder slipped and fell at hotel where she was sheltering in place while her home was being systematically and criminally destroyed by State Farm adjusters and Preferred Vendors. Head injury and broken wrist were results. The event happened after a one hour argument begging the adjuster to authorize dismissal of the assigned general contractor, “insurance adjuster representative” and the water remediation company so that legit contractors could be retained to replace the roof and repair the damages caused by the State Farm preferred vendor program. Authorization to replace the State Farm vendors was given on that call, and the State Farm Phoenix Office Adjuster advised he would advise the involved contractors that they were dismissed, and the homeowner was heading to the house to interview a local contractor. Later, more #MonkeyBusiness from the #PreferredVendors was discovered and documented. State Farm killed the claim to bury the evidence? So wrong!  #GoshDarnMeanieHeads!

 

Timeline:  [DRAFT 8]

Roof blew off 2/2/2019 Claim reported to State Farm 2/2/2019 – State Farm Claims office advised about the process and gave 3 numbers to call in order to be covered by the policy.

Paul Davis Restoration reports to property 2/4/2019, representing as adjuster representative and general contractor; demands cash, recommends having second contractor, #ServPro spread out drying equipment and commence work — because PDR was busy and “could work with ServPro”

2/4/2019 – 3/8/2019 – Pissing contest between PDR and ServPro, supervised by #StateFarm adjuster, while horrified homeowner watched clear destruction of her home; #StateFarm refused to intervene.

PDR complained they couldn’t replace roof till demolition was complete; ServPro called BS and said demo could not be complete till roof was replaced. Poorly installed tarp was useless from day one.

3/8/19 – Homeowner argued and pleaded with adjuster for over an hour to dismiss the criminal and authorize legit contractor. In shock, homeowner slipped and fell at hotel, broke her wrist and conked her head enroute to interview legit contractor.

Complaints had been made repeatedly to the State Farm adjuster that the house was being destroyed with intent to escalate the fees to repair the damage created by the failures of the State Farm Vendors– a simple roof replacement claim that began on February 2, 2019 is well over $100,000 and still climbing.

Were any of the parties involved in the destruction of the home and health of the homeowner familiar with “3rd Edition for the ANSI-IICRC S520 standard for professional mold remediation”

Greg Weatherman 1st degree connection Event Organizer at Mold Congress – When Data Matters: “Thank you [for sharing link to MoldCongress.com 2020 VirtualEvent]. We’re all 5th graders with new information. Jeff Foxworthy had the game show with the ultimate question about who was smarter than a 5th grader. It turns-out not many. I’m still shocked at those in the industry who did not know there was a current 3rd Edition for the ANSI-IICRC S520 standard for professional mold remediation as of December 2015.”

3/10/2019 #StateFarm #FieldAdjuster meets with Homeowner (just released from hospital after head injury and wrist break) and with potential replacement contractor; reviewing estimate provided by PDR and State Farm, made adjustment and #StateFarm Field adjuster authorized the change to #SavageConstruction.

MORE FOLLOWS – NOTE — THE DAMAGE WAS DONE DURING THOSE FIRST DAYS WHEREIN STATE FARM DECEIVED HOMEOWNER AND COERCED HER TO BELIEVE THAT SHE WAS REQUIRED TO USE THEIR VENDORS, FROM THEIR PREFERRED VENDOR PROGRAM, IN ORDER TO HAVE THE ROOF REPLACEMENT COVERED BY THE HOMEOWNERS POLICY.

[State Farm alleges they sent notice on or about February 28, 2019 indicating that the Preferred Vendor program was not required but was voluntary.  Policy holder was repeatedly advised that ‘nobody likes the Preferred Vendor program, but we’re stuck with it’ as she pleaded with the first adjuster to stop the destruction of her home and get legitimate contractors in to replace the roof and repair all the damage their #TeamsOfCrooks had caused.  The damage discovered afterwards is life threatening and really requires law enforcement investigations. #KickBackScams #GoneWild or something, huh?] 

Evidence clearly shows that the State Farm vendors failed to mitigate and refused to properly install a temporary tarp, refused to replace the roof or even provide the homeowner with a written estimate for a roof and build back prior to approval from the client, State Farm. Threats were made and damage was done.

More follows—–including forensic level research into why the identified water damaged walls throughout the property were not demolished and remediated by the State Farm Preferred Vendor team in February / March 2019; why the State Farm Preferred Environmental testing company missed so much mold and how, despite evidence, State Farm caused extreme damage to the property and to the property owner’s health by the dangerous delays and denials to remediate once the errors of the first State Farm dispatched Vendors was evidenced.

Reports on the forensic research including multiple ‘remediation and testing companies’ is eye opening —- the lack of regulation and access to vetted qualified vendors in the remediation world is a national disgrace and and extreme public health hazard.  

#BuildYourEmail lists — SUBSCRIBE AND SHARE…..  BECAUSE

#WeAreTheMediaNow and sometimes the #CourtOfPublicOpinion is the only Court that will hear complaints about criminal corporate corruption. #InsuranceFraud is #NotAVictimlessCrime #KickBackScams #GoneWild?  

#StayAlert — Tell your friends and neighbors; your governments already know and some politicians may be funded to #LookAway….

State Farm adjusters and Preferred Vendors seem to think that water intrusion can be left unabated and unremediated for more than 40 days without causing MOLD GROWTH and consequent microbial dangers.

They support their vendors who poorly install a loose fitting roof tarp with nails and sandbags over part of the roof, and expect it to last more than 40 days  

State Farm and their preferred vendors seem to believe that partial wall demolition in known water saturated areas throughout the house, combined with some air movers is sufficient remediation.  

When their environmental testing company takes 3 air samples plus one outdoor and calls the property ready for build back, and after build back- the house is discovered to be highly toxic, State Farm protects their Preferred Vendor Program rather than their policy holder and the adjusters suggest ‘some things must have happened after the build back’  

WOW, COULD THAT BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARD PROTOCOLS RECOMMENDED IN THE CURRENT MOLD REMEDIATION STANDARDS S520-2015 THIRD EDITION

How many State Farm adjusters and managers are required to be authorize a roof replacement to restore a home to pre-loss condition in California?  Why are none of them authorized to address clear evidence of insurance fraud by their dispatched preferred teams, as if the have no subrogation department? 

More importantly, why do they think they can get away with causing extreme property damage and health damage to one of their elderly disabled female policy holders? They don’t really believe the California Department of Insurance bows & defers to them, do they?

Let’s count:

  1. Randy Brewer
  2. Vincent
  3. Sue
  4. Joey Cammiso
  5. Tunde 
  6. Fred Tan
  7. Plus email contact allegedly to State Farm CEO, Michael L Tipsord,* and help desk  (they will refuse to send transcripts of recorded calls to disabled Americans reporting complaints—well, they will advise to ask the next agent how to obtain transcripts)

Joey and his bosses State Farm ® seem to think that because their vendor – an environmental testing company in AgouraHills or someplace like that in #SouthernCalifornia did 3 fast air tests and an outside test, no swabs, no visuals, and just a tiny part of an entire house that had extreme #waterintrusion because there was no roof for 40 days because …..

WHY WAS THERE NO ROOF AND UNABATED WATER INTRUSION FOR SO MANY DAYS?  #AskJoeyAtStateFarm – he thinks he knows.  

Not one #StateFarm employee is familiar with the MOLD REMEDIATION STANDARDS – 3RD EDITION – 2015??https://tinyurl.com/MoldRemediation-3rdEdition

WHY IS THE FAILURE TO PROPERLY TARP AND REFUSAL TO REPLACE THE ROOF FOR SO MANY DAYS THE PROXIMATE CAUSE OF EXTREME MICROBIAL DANGERS IN THE ENTIRE HOUSE?  THE POLICY HAS A 5,000 MOLD CAP—- BUT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN STATE FARM AND IT’S VENDORS CAUSE THE CONTAMINATION BY REFUSALS TO DO THE WORK REQUIRED IN A TIMELY COMPLETE AND TO PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS. 

That is taking the old adage that “crimes pay” way too far, wouldn’t you agree?  If the insurance carrier CAUSES a claim to exceed $10,000 by criminal gross negligence, to have the carrier restore the property to pre-loss condition, does it require DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND OR FBI investigations and indictments into what appears to be organized criminal activities at worst; extreme incompetence and abuse of elderly disabled policy holders at the very least?  #AskingForSomeFriends

BECAUSE their preferred vendors attempted to extort $7,000 cash from the policy holder to get a roof on sooner rather than later, that because the homeowner relied on what she believed that “I don’t have $7,000 cash to give you besides, I have great insurance with #StateFarm‘… well, Joey and his co-conspirators aka co-workers and managers apparently believe the grossly negligent report that was provided to State Farm, which State Farm, in turn, authorized another contractor (chosen by homeowner and authorized after meeting with/by State Farm Field Adjuster) to commence build back, who commenced build back based on the State Farm provided report from the grossly negligent environmental air quality testing company.

WHEW! TALK ABOUT AN OBFUSCATED MESS!

Sources, Noted and Recommended Further Reading and Research
  1. GotContractorComplaints.com  SUBSCRIBE COMMENT & SHARE because you can
  2. ANSI/IICRC S520- MOLD REMEDIATION – THIRD EDITION: 2015 https://publications.iicrc.org/current-standards/s520-2015?qr=1
  3. MOLD REMEDIATION STANDARDS – 3RD EDITION  http://tinyurl.com/MoldRemediation-3rdEdition    
  4. Ayres on State Farm Insurance on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/posts/lindaayres311_10-things-you-didnt-know-about-state-farm-activity-6671795172902342656-X3wh
  5. 10 Things You Didn’t Know About State Farm CEO Michael Tipsord  https://moneyinc.com/state-farm-ceo-michael-tipsord/
Categories
#GotContractorComplaints #VirtualCombatSkills Court of Public Opinion Got Contractor Complaints How to Win in Court IF your roof blows off and bad guys say SORRY NOT SORRY Linda Ayres vs StateFarm et al LITTLE HOUSE ON THE MESA MoldCongress.com

WHEN INSURANCE CARRIERS FAIL HOME OWNERS, DESTROY THEIR HOMES AND HEALTH…… WHATEVER CAN WE DO?

NOTICE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION, IN PRO PER
Date of Loss:  2/2/2019  and ongoing 

IF your roof blows off and bad guys say SORRY NOT SORRY

Joey Cammiso
Adjuster – Phoenix Arizona
Direct Line:  480 2938219
 
Dear Mr Cammiso:
 

Ms Ayres indicated that only because you “say so”, disregarding all provided facts, images and evidence, the claim is closed and cannot be opened until you receive a letter of representation with intent to proceed with a multi-party lawsuit.  Let this letter serve as notice of intent to pursue legal action to the fullest extent of the law in Court.

I represent Linda Ayres, your policy holder, for the property located at __________________, California regarding the wind/rain/water/microbial damage to her home that began on 2/2/2019 and increased a simple $10,000 claim to what will be more than $100,000 and still escalating.

If one minute is required in Court, a $10,000,000 bad faith, personal injury, criminal gross negligence with intent to cause property and bodily harm claim, in collusion with the State Farm Preferred Vendor network, in the appearance of RICO level criminal activity, causing Ms. Ayres further duress and fear for her life, will be filed.

You are to immediately cease communication with Ms. Ayres and all communications must go through me.  
Any further calls to Ms. Ayres will be considered further harassment and attempts at intimidation and elder abuse.
You may recall that your conversation with Ms. Ayres yesterday concluded with a tearful screaming that ‘You sent F—-ing thugs to my house. You sent F–ing thugs to my house who destroyed my home and my health, who threatened me and attempted to extort money from me more than once and attempted to involve me in their insurance fraud capers’  — or words to that effect. 
Is that your recollection of that part of the call?
 
Ms Ayres recapped the telephone call you conducted with her on 5/13/2020, and she has apprised me of other calls with you, and your superiors, as well as conversation and emails with the first adjuster, Randy Brewer, during the first two months, and then the switching of adjusters, causing greater confusion and obfuscation of the facts, causing my client further harm, delays, denials and exposure to toxic microbial growth, extreme out of pocket expenses, and need to evacuate from the property that was not restored to PRELOSS CONDITION, AS REQUIRED BY THE INSURANCE POLICY.
 You have been repeatedly apprised of the threats to Ms. Ayres’ property and her fear for her health and her life because of this experience. The threats are compounded because of her disclosed disabilities, which it appears your adjuster staff and preferred vendor teams perceived as an ‘easy target for fraud and abuse.’
 Ms. Ayres indicated that you asked her ‘What would State Farm have to gain by making a $10,000 claim grow into one of over $100,000?’   
It gives the appearance of a complicated kick-back and protection scam, and had Ms. Ayres not insisted and begged to dismiss the vendors sent to her home multiple time in February and March 2019, the damages could have been far worse.  

You told her that she should not profit by the losses, NOR SHOULD SHE BE LEFT IN A WORSE CONDITION.  You admitted she was not given any information on her choices about the Preferred Vendor program until the damage was already done.

You may also realize that due to the duress of helplessly watching her home destroyed by what she calls ‘criminal conduct’ —not only did she fear for her property and her life, she slipped at the hotel she was in while the house was being destroyed, and sustained serious injuries to her brain, and her wrist. 

We are seeking co-counsel for personal injury of the March 8, 2019 event, as well as the toxic mold overload which is the consequence of
a) THE REFUSAL AND FAILURE TO REPLACE THE ROOF;
b) THE FAILURE AND REFUSAL TO COMPLETELY AND ADEQUATELY DEMOLISH KNOWN WATER SATURATED WALLS AS EVIDENCED THE DIAGRAM PROVIDED TO MS AYRES BY RANDY BREWER, and
c) THE DENIAL BY STATE FARM TO AUTHORIZE COMPLETION OF THE THE FORENSICALLY IDENTIFIED UNMITIGATED WATER DAMAGED AREAS AS CLEARLY IDENTIFIED IN THE NOVEMBER 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENIST LIVING REPORT.  

While the State Farm Field adjuster authorized the November 2019 exploratory inspection of the walls known to not have been demolished or remediated, upon the receipt of the report, your offices scampered, saw the extent of the damage, and decided to deny the claim, first telling her to take it up with the contractors who did the work, then your offices tried to place all the fault on the 2nd contractor, despite the hard evidence provided that the first environmental report was apparently fraudulent,  regarding the condition of the  unmitigated unremediated saturated walls had weeks, then months of microbial growth, and even more was discovered upon opening the walls.

Ms Ayres was aghast when your discussion about the failure to to RESTORE HER HOME TO PRELOSS CONDITION was met with you comments that ‘according to the pictures you saw in the November inspection report, there were walls and everything looked fine’ 

You also, earlier in the conversation indicated that since your Air Quality inspectors deemed the house to be mold free in March 2019, ‘something must have happened between March and November or June to have caused mold, which has a $5,000 cap, and your position remains the same.  Claim closed.’ 

The same environmental air quality testing company was called back to the plaintiff’s home in August 2019, with another fraudulent report, later revised to recommend surface cleaning (at an estimate cost of $10,000 from yet another State Farm Preferred Vendor) WITHOUT ADDRESSING THE CAUSE OF THE MICROBIAL GROWTH, BEING THE KNOWN WATER SATURATED WALLS, UNDEMOLISHED AND UNREMEDIATED.  

 My client has spent thousands of dollars to identify which walls were the source of the life-threatening microbial growth, with multiple tests, concluded in a comprehensive test in November.  The delays and denials by State Farm adjusters have caused extreme toxic mold exposure and illness, and your bad faith and deceptions and obfusations of facts and presented evidence was again proven in your communications yesterday.

YOUR CONVENIENT DISREGARD OF THE MARCH 2020 REPORT with swaths of images of microbial growth and people in PPE suits, FOLLOWING THE FEBRUARY/MARCH 2020 DEMOLITION AND REMEDIATION, WHICH COST MS AYRES OVER $25,000 AND THERE IS STILL MORE TO DO, WHICH MAY ALSO INCLUDE THE KITCHEN ADJACENT TO THE WATER DAMAGE IN THE BATHROOM SEEMS, TO MS AYRES, TO BE FURTHER EVIDENCE OF A CONSPIRACY IN YOUR ARIZONA OFFICE TO PERPETUATE THESE INSURANCE CRIMES TO CHEAT HER, CAUSING FURTHER INSULTS AND INJURIES.

I have also advised Ms Ayres to immediately file complaints with the Department of Insurance, the California Contractor Board, the FBi and the Court of Public Opinion regarding matters of personal injury due to criminal gross negligence, bad faith, oppression, breaches of contract, abuses and discrimination of an American with disabilities and more. Speciality Co-counsels will assist with the complaints.

 

Ms Ayres was afraid that State Farm is again discriminating because of her disclosed disabilities, age, and gender, so while she has been unsuccessful in retaining licensed legal counsel for the entire lawsuit, the State of California does allow in pro per representation.  

She further advised that although you confirmed and verified that she was deceived by the first adjuster and the dispatched preferred vendors that she was required to use them, she  not given notice that was NOT REQUIRED to use your Preferred Vendors until a letter was sent on or about February 28, 2019, which she may or may not have received in early March.  She recalls conversations that such a letter was sent, but she has no recollection of receiving it.   

The first adjuster, Randy Brewer, and the Preferred Vendors dispatched by State Farm deceived her into believing that her policy gave her no choice but to use the vendors sent to her home, who destroyed her home by failing to mitigate water intrusion, failures to properly tarp the property, and they failed and refused to replace the roof for over 40 days, causing extreme saturation of contents and drywall and insulation. 

The State Farm field adjuster did not inspect the property until approximately March 10, 2019. The Phoenix office adjuster was kept apprised of the vandalism, destruction and gross negligence of the onsite workers from two of your preferred vendors.

State Farm dispatched an unlicensed “adjuster representative” who falsely portrayed himself as a qualified licensed general contractor, who demanded a $7,000 cash payment in order to get the roof installed quickly.  That was for a $5,000 subcontractor cost, so while you allegedly tried to convince Ms Ayres that was a legitimate ‘profit and overhead’ to have charged State Farm nearly $10,000 — it sounds excessive, and a different percentage that was paid for the second contractor.

Mr Brewer was fully aware that the vendors would take no action without his explicit approval and that they would not even give my client an estimate for the roof and build-back work until it had been approved by Mr. Brewer.

There was what appeared to be a conspiracy to deceive the insured homeowner by your adjuster offices and vendors. You have been sent copies of correspondence verifying these allegations.

Ms Ayres claims she repeatedly requested that Mr Brewer elevate the claim to your legal department as a crime scene, and he refused repeatedly.  He told her that ‘nobody likes the Preferred Vendor Program, but we’re stuck with it’ in February 2019.

In early March 2019, Ms. Ayres begged Mr Brewer for permission to dismiss the preferred vendors who had refused to replace the roof or protect the household goods.  Reluctantly, Mr. Brewer finally authorized dismissal and said he would advise all parties.  

Mr.Brewer  further led Ms. Ayres to believe that the next contractor had to approved by the field adjuster, using the scope of work already provided by the unlicensed “adjuster representative. Because of her slip and fall, and not wanting to further delay getting a roof and build back, Ms Ayres and your field adjuster and the first available contractor  met on or about March 10, 2019 to discuss what was required to proceed and authorization was perceived as given by the field adjuster to the general contractor/roofer.

 The demolition by your Preferred Vendors was incomplete and the project was allegedly abandoned, according to their correspondence to Randy Brewer, on or about February 19, 2019.  Ms. Ayres has sent evidence repeatedly showing that their vehicles and staff continued to visit the property through early March, and no notice was given to Ms. Ayres that the work was complete.

Your offices directed my client to file a second claim for the additional damages, and based on that strategy implemented by your team, and the position that each claim has a mold-cap of $5,000, even when State Farm and it’s Preferred Vendors were the CAUSE OF any/all MICROBIAL DAMAGE.  She reluctantly provide the date of the snow storm damage of February 22, 2019 to your offices. 

In her recent communications, she inquired about the claims strategy and suggested that since in those 40 days without a roof, appxomately 30 of those days had extreme rain, wind, and snow, perhaps filing 30 claims to get home restored to pre-loss condition would be a possibility. 
You reiterated that ‘the claim is closed’ although you know very well the home has not been restored to preloss condition, and her health has been egregiously harmed BECAUSE the roof was not replaced for over 40 days, CAUSING EXTREME WATER INTRUSION THROUGH OUT THE ENTIRE HOUSE, AND HOUSEHOLD CONTENTS and that demolition that was done in February 2019 was incomplete, poorly done and included no remediation.

MS AYRES HAS REPEATEDLY REQUESTED THAT THE SCOPE OF WORK BE COMPLETED, AND PROVIDED FULL EVIDENCE TO YOU AND YOUR SUPERIORS THAT THE WORK DONE BY VENDORS DISPATCHED BY STATE FARM….. CAUSED THE EXTREME DESTRUCTION OF THE HOME AND HEALTH, AND NEEDS TO BE RESTORED TO PRE-LOSS CONDITION.

State Farm dispatched an Environmental Air Quality Testing Company in March 2019, who tested only 3 rooms in a home 6 room house that they knew had approximately 40 days of extreme water intrusion because of the first vendor’s refusal to replace the roof.  The environment reports showed the air with essential no mold whatsoever, which is also a fraud alert. 

The build back was authorized by the environmental company dispatched by State Farm, and the State Farm field adjuster. 
The scope of work provided by the unlicensed State Farm “adjuster representative” was used and approved by the field adjuster, who approved the replacement general contractor.  That meeting included Ms. Ayres, who had just been released from the hospital because of the slip and fall, head injury/broken wrist after her lengthy conversation on the horrors of watching her home destroyed by criminals with apparent complicity by your adjuster teams.
Ms Ayres said that your company is not interested in settlement, nor mediation, and there is no offer on the table, and nothing could happen until a letter of representation was received by State Farm regarding pending litigation.  She told you she would consider a settlement offer, or would fight till her last gasps. 
Her home and health have been destroyed and while you indicate State Farm does not condone or support or participate in insurance fraud, I have recommended to Ms. Ayres that the Department of Insurance might be the better judge of that.
Any offers to settle this matter must go through me, and our designated structured settlement company, until and unless otherwise notified.
Because I am also an American with Disabilities, any phones calls are also subject to recording.  
Ms Ayres has been instructed to file complaints, as previously mentioned, immediately with Department of Insurance, Contractors Board, Consumer Affairs and the Court of Public Opinion.   I had previously advised Ms. Ayres to refrain from public website complaints, but I have instructed her to proceed without fear or caution, and to simply stick to the facts. 
Her State Farm insurance agent recommended (illegally) that she use her social media sites to seek help in securing licensed legal representation, and I concur with that recommendation, and you may follow the blog, as you have already been apprised, at ContractorComplaints.com The agent  suggested filing a complaint for $10,000,000 and I again concur. 
While Ms Ayres said, before knowledge of the health damage caused by State Farm, that she didn’t need $10,000,000 — she just wanted her home restored to preloss condition, reimbursements for out of pocket expenses, loss of use, and pain and suffering…. so the agent told her to ‘find an attorney who will sue for $10,000,000 and tell them you just want $1,000,000 and they can keep $9,000,000.’
As we all know, it is illegal in California to require that a policy holder sue for policy benefits, and that’s apparently why Bad Faith claims exist.  My fees are 50% of any settlement that may be offered, mediated and accepted. 
If additional representation is required, my client will be required to sue for legal fees as well.
I have further suggested to Ms Ayres that in light of the bad faith, a compilation of emails and images in a short or medium length ebook may be theraputic for her, and help her recover losses from the egregious harm caused to her and her property by State Farm and it’s preferred vendor program.
Cordially,
Linda Ayres, In ProPer
lindaayres311@gmail.com
cc:  Linda Ayres, Client 
workcomplinda@gmail.com
—————
Learn more about the lethality of toxic mold contamination —
Search Facebook groups and also see the upcoming MoldCongress.com
The life you save could be your own.

TOXIC MOLD OVERLOAD — FROM 40 DAYS OF WATER INTRUSION BECAUSE STATE FARM AND PREFERRED VENDORS WOULDN’T REPLACE A ROOF – LETHAL MOLD TOXICITY – HOME AND BODY

Update:  5/14/2020 – State Farm obviously discriminates against in ProPer adversaries.  On the telephone conversation he told ‘my client’ that upon receiving a letter of representation, the claim would move from his desk to the next level toward settlement. At no time did he say that change would only happen upon receipt of a filed Complaint, in fact,  he told ‘my client’ he knows nothing about the litigation side of claims.   So, we will assume this to be further discrimination and violations of civil rights. We can also legitimately assume he cannot or does not read with greater than a grammar school level of comprehension. Onward.