WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY CAUSES CATASTROPHIC WATER DAMAGE AND TOXIC EXPOSURE?


LINDA AYRES VS STATE FARM ET AL – THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

READ IT YOURSELF, AND SEE THE EXHIBITS.  DRAW YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS.  USE IT AS A TRAINING TOOL IF YOU’RE A LAW STUDENT, A PUBLIC ADJUSTER, OR SIMPLY A POLICY HOLDER.

It makes me wonder who we can call to get #StateFarm and it’s colluding #PremierServices members designated as ‘domestic terrorists’ by DHS.  State Farm publicly supported #BLM, their chairman is a trustee at #BrookingsInstitution, which just had their president resign (an alleged US military general!!) for FBI indictment related, apparently, to money laundering with Qatar.  Isn’t there a conspiracy theory about a congresswoman also having ties to #Qatar?  Where the heck is that, anyway, and what’s it got to do with our homeowner and auto insurance policies.   Ask Michael Tipsord.  We think he’ll know more.  #BlackMoldMatters  – #JakeKnows

There seems to be some confusion regarding the Third Amended Complaint, that was painstakingly amended, per Court permissions, and also in order to redact/remove the names and references to 5 defendants that reached settlements earlier in the year, that were negotiated by Plaintiff in good faith for speed in order to find legal counsel.

What was agreed to happen in weeks took months, and prospects for legal counsel declined after the lengthy delay in the settlements.  Those defendants understood that time was also of the essence in order to remove their names from the Complaint.

The July 6, 2022 deadline was met.  Plaintiff first took the Amended Complaint to the Court Clerk.  The Judge’s Clerk directed Plaintiff to the 3rd Floor Clerk for filing, acknowledging that the Courts were quite behind with filings.

Abusive discovery deadlines were met and sanctions for inability to keep pace with demands that “even a seasoned litigator could not manage” were paid by Plaintiff, as she did not properly “plead” for protection against the abuses.

Blanked accommodations for time extensions were denied but are available to be ruled on a situational basis.  70-years old, traumatic brain injury, toxic exposure, blacklisted from help from California legal community for protection when home was destroyed, on purpose, in a failed insurance scam apparently organized and run by an out of state State Farm adjuster claims office.

The legal system in America favors corruption, or so it seems.  Ex Parte Hearing apparently scheduled for tomorrow, to sort things out with the Judge.

In Chamber hearing will again be requested, and some sort of supervision for the processes, for the protection Justice and of this self-represented plaintiff who has been subjected to extreme lawfare since filing in 2021.  Due to lawfare, many court hearings have taken place, yet only one defendant has had motions ruled on, yet responsible counsel is now blaming the Plaintiff, self-represented, for the excessive billable hours to their client.  Isn’t that something.

The abuses of elderly disabled women (AND OTHERS)  in California (AND ELSEHWERE) by the insurance industries is heinous.

#BlackMoldMatters

WE ARE THE MEDIA NOW….  and for that WE ARE RESPONSIBLE

 

 

TAC – LINDA AYRES VS STATE FARM ET AL CIV SB 2016284 JULY 6 2022 –

 

exhibits 1

exhibits 2

 

 


One response to “WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY CAUSES CATASTROPHIC WATER DAMAGE AND TOXIC EXPOSURE?”

  1. What do you think?
    Here’s their link about what AEG can do for State Farm adjusters and managers….upon request?
    https://www.americanenv.com/services/litigation-support/

    DOES IT MAKE SENSE TO HAVE A COMPANY LIKE STATE FARM ASSIGN, as a direct client, A COMPANY LIKE AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP TO TEST FOR MOLD CLEARANCE AFTER A SWATH OF UNLAWFULLY ASSIGNED STATE FARM PREMIER SERVICES VENDORS BOTCH THE JOB, CAUSE CATASTROPHIC DAMAGES AND LIFE THREATENING EXPOSURE TO THE HOME OF THE ELDERLY DISABLED FEMALE POLICY HOLDER?

    How can they be called “non-biased” when their report was THE COVERUP PIECE OF EVIDENCE?

    ISN’T THAT SOMEWHAT OF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST?

    WHAT IF THE ‘LEGAL SUPPORT’ INCLUDES CYBER STALKING, THREATS OF INVASIVE TESTING AT POLICY HOLDER’S COST, FINANCIAL RUIN AND A LEVEL OF LAWFARE AND DISCOVERY THAT ‘NOT EVEN A SEASONED LITIGATOR’ COULD HANDLE?

    SURE SOUNDS LIKE RACKETEERING TO ME. HOW ABOUT YOU?

    #RuleOfLawMatters — if a self-represented litigant cannot successfully plead the RICO cause of action, perhaps DOJ and FBI might step up and step in?

    Yikes, looks all legal-like, but the results don’t add up….

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: